Since early summer of this year, we’ve seen a big divergence in performance between domestic stocks and emerging markets:
Chart Source: Google Finance
That’s almost 20% total returns divergence.
Most of the blame is currently placed on a strong dollar. The U.S. Federal Reserve has been tightening its balance sheet and raising interest rates, which makes the dollar a more desirable currency to hold compared to many alternatives.
A lot of emerging markets countries (both governments and companies therein) have debt in U.S. dollars. They do this because compared to debt in their more volatile local currencies, they can often get lower interest rates if their debt is in USD. However, if the dollar rises considerably compared to their local currency, it raises the value of their debt in terms of their local currency (which is where their revenue is coming from), and can increase the risk of default.
This has slammed Turkey and Argentina the hardest. Both of those countries have very limited foreign reserves, which is the government’s best tool for strengthening their currency relative to other currencies. Turkey has high corporate debt in USD, while Argentina has high government debt in USD. On the other hand, countries like Thailand that have massive foreign reserves and limited debt in USD have held up very well in recent months.
This chart shows, for example, what has happened to Turkish stocks compared to Thai stocks, even though both are classified as emerging markets:
Chart Source: Google Finance
Like Thailand, China also has large foreign reserves and limited external debt, but broad fears about the potential trade war between the United States and China have seriously weighed down Chinese equities. The Trump administration has recently proposed putting tariffs on virtually all Chinese imports. Tariffs on $50 billion are already in place, tariffs on another $200 billion are in preparation, and another $267 billion are proposed as a potential third wave.
With global trade volumes in jeopardy, and a strong dollar hurting certain emerging markets governments and companies, is it time to pull out of emerging markets?
Recommended Stock Investing Posts:
- Using The Power Of The 80-20 Rule For Larger Returns
- Pros and Cons To Investing In The Stock Market Today
- How to Teach Your Children to Invest in the Stock Market
- Why Blue Chip Stocks Should Be Your First Investment
- Roth IRA Conversion Ladder for Early Retirees: Decoded
- Investment Diversification: 5 Risky Mistakes to Avoid
- Traditional IRA vs. Roth IRA vs. 401k
- Using The Graham Formula to Find Underpriced Stocks
Where the Opportunity Is
Quite the contrary, it’s likely a good time for investors to re-balance into emerging markets, to make sure they maintain exposure there. Successful stock investing is about buying good business fundamentals at reasonable prices.
A few small economies like Turkey and Argentina are in real trouble, but the EM powerhouses like China and India have solid fundamentals. Russia, Thailand, South Korea and others are fundamentally solid as well. Brazil is a bit of a mix depending on how upcoming elections turn out.
Chinese exports to the United States are around $500 billion per year, and their nominal GDP is over $12 trillion. U.S. exports, in other words, account for a little over 4% of Chinese GDP. If Chinese exports to the United States get cut in half thanks to tariffs (an unlikely scenario), that’s a 2% reduction to China’s GDP, which is currently growing at over 6% per year.
Realistically the negative effect of that level of export reduction would likely be larger than that due to ripple effects. The arithmetic is not so simple considering all the parts of the supply chain that are involved with exports. Certain industries would suffer more severely than others, and it would definitely be a headwind against economic growth for China. But is it a catastrophe? Likely not in the long run.
The MSCI China index currently has 447 constituent companies with an average price-to-earnings ratio of a little over 14, an average forward price-to-earnings ratio of little over 11, and a price-to-book ratio of under 1.8. More broadly, MSCI emerging markets have a P/E of under 14, a forward P/E of a little over 11, and a P/B of under 1.7. This is a value investor’s ideal market.
As this chart shows, emerging markets are very volatile:
Source: MSCI EM Index
While you would certainly not want all of your portfolio in something this volatile, having a portion of your portfolio in emerging markets gives you plenty of good entry points.
Emerging markets have a 20%+ sell-off every two years on average, and some years are up massively. If you buy the dips when the fundamental valuations are cheap, you can build an ever-larger basket of emerging market exposure at very low prices.
Even simply having a broad emerging market ETF as a set portion of your portfolio (perhaps 10%), and re-balancing it whenever it diverges like this, lets you harness that volatility. For example, if you hold emerging markets as 10% of your portfolio, and they go down while the rest of your portfolio goes up, then you probably have around 8% of your portfolio in emerging markets after that fact. So when it comes time to add new money, putting money into emerging markets to boost your allocation back up to 10% is a natural form of value investing without having to try to time the market.
Could EM equities go down even more in the short term? Absolutely. Trade wars, high global debt, currency swings, and all sorts of things can make investors pull money out of emerging market funds.
However, there is a high probability that investors 5 or 10 years from now will look back at 2018 as having been a solid entry point into low-valuation emerging markets.
Disclosure: The author is long IEMG and EWZ as part of a diversified portfolio.